At 75 years of age, he still could shovel half a ton of coal by hand. His face bore the scars of countless fights with police and strike breakers. In his day, social media did not exist, firing into striking miners happened frequently. He would laugh as he described how he walked over 5000 miles in one year from coal mine to coal mine, the police were watching all bus terminals and train stations. He knew if they took him into custody, he wouldn’t survive the questioning. He laughed that the police and mine owners never counted on how strong his legs were. If you asked this man, was he a leftist, he proudly would say yes. Even at 75, he wasn’t afraid to defend his point of view in a bar with his fists. How did the Limousine Liberals turn men like this into sniveling whining pussies?

Many of your heroes of old, were actually liberals.

Judge a man by his actions and his results, not by his religion. Despite being an agnostic, I always admired Johnny Cash who is an evangelical Christian. He grew up as a poor Texas sharecropper, the only thing that kept him going was his faith. Johnny Cash stood by his principles even if it risked public backlash. In 1963, Johnny Cash released his interpretation of The Legend Of John Henry’s Hammer an old labor organizers song. In my post How the internet causes shallowness, I talked about how machines have become more important than workers. The The Legend Of John Henry’s Hammer describes a battle between a steam hammer and John Henry.

John Henry said to his captain, a man ain’t nothin but a man, but if you bring that steam drill round, I’ll beat it fair and honest, I’ll die with my hammer in my hand, but I’ll be laughing, cuz you can’t replace a steel driven man

There was a big crowd of people at the mountain, John Henry said to the steam drill how is you, pardon me mister steam drill, I suppose you didn’t hear me, I said how you, well can you turn a jack, can you lay a track, can you pick and shovel too, listen this hammer swingers talkin’ to you

Despite being an agnostic, one of my favorite songs is The Reverend Mr. Black.

I gotta walk that lonesome valley, I got to walk it by myself
Oh, nobody else can walk it for me, I got to walk it by myself
You got to walk that lonesome valley, you got to walk it by yourself
Oh, nobody else can walk it for you, you got to walk it by yourself
If ever I could have thought this man in black was soft
And had any yellow up his back
I gave that notion up the day a lumberjack came in
And it wasn’t to pray

One comes into the world alone, one leaves this world alone. In my posts Get rid of unrealistic social expectations to alleviate loneliness and The dangerous soulmate myth, I described the how we attempt to surround ourselves with people to hide our innermost fears. Country music is supposed about suffering and how to deal with it. Modern Country music no longer reflects this. In what other areas have things changed?

Rewriting of history

The first battlefield is to rewrite history.
Anyone who knows anything of history knows that great social changes are impossible without feminine upheaval.
Social progress can be measured exactly by the social position of the fair sex, the ugly ones included.
~ Karl Marx

George MacDonald Fraser is famous for his now politically incorrect Harry Flashman series. The series started as a joke, Fraser claimed to have found the diaries of Harry Flashman who was a highly decorated hero. The diaries revealed that Flashman was a coward, womanizer, opportunist, and bully. He then claimed to have based the novels on this series. To his amusement, many people were asking him to show the actual diaries, which of course didn’t exist.

Limousine liberals attack his books for stating facts like white guys traded liquor to American Indians (Native Americans) for furs. Since American Indians couldn’t handle liquor, they behaved like savages. He also points out, before his Scottish ancestors joined the United Kingdom, they spent half their time getting drunk on whiskey, running around naked and killing each other. The Limousine Liberal is inherently racist since he judges different ethnic groups with different criteria.

Before becoming an author, George MacDonald Fraser, served during During WW2 as a private in the infantry during Burma campaign. Most books about war are written by Generals, Officers or politicians. Few books are written from the perspective of the infantryman, the ground pounder or grunt. To prevent this history from being lost he wrote Quartered Safe Out Here: A Harrowing Tale of World War II which describes his experience during one of the longest campaigns during WW2. For political reasons, both Indians and British have chosen to forget that 25% of the soldiers which fought for the British Empire where nonWhite and members of colonies. If the British Empire was that awful, why would Indians and other nonWhite members of the empire be willing to die for it?

The was unquestionable racism within the British Empire but the Empire respected culture. This is evident in how the Empire set up its military. Members of different cultures belonged to different regiments. With Indian troops, they divided into mainly Hindu, Sikh, Muslim and Gurka regiments. Fraser talks about how when British troops were deployed next to Indians troops they would visit the Indian troops and they treated each other with respect. The Gurkhas have traditionally been the elite of Indian troops, they have been loyal to Britain for over 200 years and continue to serve Britain to this day. What about the argument that the Indian troops were coerced or forced to fight for the British?

By WW2, many Indian regiments had Indian officers but there were a few Indian regiments that had British officers. During the Burma campaign platoon or company sized Indian units were deployed on independent actions. They could at any time have disappeared into the jungle or defected to the Japanese. Fraser was tasked to deliver a new antitank weapon to one of these remote Indian platoons which had a British officer. When he arrived, he saw the platoon was in good order but couldn’t find the British officer. He then asked the Indian soldiers what happened to their officer. The officer due to isolation and having no one to speak English with had a mental breakdown. The Indian NCOs were now running the platoon, and looking after their British officer. The Indian soldiers could have easily killed the British officer then defected to the Japanese for a handsome reward.

If the British Empire was as bad as Limousine Liberals claim it was, would Indians be willing to fight and die for it?

Equality means being given a fighting chance

Later Fraser was sent to officer school. The school included many Indians and Gurkhas. One of the Gurkas kept on getting bullied by a racist Brit student. Traditionally in the British military, the officers and NCOs, would let the members of units sort out problems themselves. The racist Brit kept on dropping racist comments, the Gurka got angry but held it in. The Brit made the mistake of dropping a racist comment in the barracks when the where no officers or NCOs around. The Gurka without warning rushed the Brit, wrestled him to the ground, pulled his Kukri, the traditional Gurka curved knife, and tried to cut off the Brit’s head. The rest of the Officer school students stepped in and separated the two, after that the racist comments about the Gurka stopped, he had proven he was equal.

After WW2, George MacDonald Fraser served as an officer in a Scottish Regiment. The The Complete McAuslan Series is a humorous account of his adventures. Traditionally soldiers who served in Scottish Regiments were of Scots origins, they wear kilts and the regimental band where bagpipes play a key role. The modern Progressive British government, of course, wants to destroy this, they are disbanding these regiments. Despite most of the members of the Scotish regiments coming from uneducated backgrounds, one thing that shone through is the traditional Scottish/British sense of fair play and equal opportunity.

What to do if a black man joins a Scottish Regiment? To make matters worse, he wants to play the bagpipes in the regimental band. This was 1950s Britain, political correctness did not exist. This was a debate among the Officers and Senior NCOs should a black man be allowed to join the regimental band. Some of the Officers and NCOs argued they did not want the regiment to be represented by a black man. Finally it was agreed on, in the tradition of fair play and equal opportunity the black man should be allowed to try out for the band.

To learn how to play the bagpipes takes at least 10 years, if you ever have tried to blow up the bag of a set of bagpipes, it is impossible. You have to be trained from an early age. It was assumed that the black man lacked the skills to play the pipes, so the officers against the black man agreed to the competition. To everyone’s surprise, the black man was the best piper. It later turned out, by some accident he was raised by a Scottish family and learned how to play the pipes. He then was allowed to join the band and the British concept of equal opportunity and fair play was upheld.

I earlier stated that George MacDonald Fraser considered himself to be a Liberal in the traditional sense. How does the Limousine Liberal or Progressive differ from the Traditional Liberal? How did Mr. MacDonald define liberal?

The original definition of Liberal

Twenty years ago, I was talking to an elderly lady. Due to a heart ailment, she never got married, since she would die early. After she finished high school she worked as a teller in the bank until she retired. Despite being alone, she always had a positive outlook on life, she always joked that since she expected to die any day, every day was a surprise. I asked her how she liked her job at the bank. She replied it was a great job until the 1980s then things started to change. I asked, why?. Her answer surprised me, she said, that is when the WW2 veterans started to retire, even when they where in management they where never scared to question the bank. It was then that things started to go downhill.

As George MacDonald Fraser puts it, the WW2 veteran voted for Liberal which in those days meant labor.

With the exception of Parker, who I suspect voted Tory if he voted at all (free lances are a conservative lot), and one or two of the rustics, who may have voted Liberal, they were Labour to a man, but not necessarily socialists as the term is understood now. Their socialism was of a simple kind: they had known the ’thirties, and they didn’t want it again: the dole queue, the street corner, the true poverty of that time. They wanted jobs, and security, and a better future for their children than they had had – and they got that, and were thankful for it. It was what they had fought for, over and beyond the pressing need of ensuring that Britain did not become a Nazi slave state.
Still, the Britain they see in their old age is hardly “the land fit for heroes” that they envisaged – if that land existed in their imaginations, it was probably a place where the pre-war values co-existed with decent wages and housing. It was a reasonable, perfectly possible dream, and for a time it existed, more or less. And then it changed, in the name of progress and improvement and enlightenment, which meant the destruction of much that they had fought for and held dear, and the betrayal of familiar things that they had loved. Some of them, to superficial minds, will seem terribly trivial, even ludicrously so – things like county names, and shillings and pence, and the King James Version, and yards and feet and inches – yet they matter to a nation.
They did not fight for a Britain which would be dishonestly railroaded into Europe against the people’s will; they did not fight for a Britain where successive governments, by their weakness and folly, would encourage crime and violence on an unprecedented scale; they did not fight for a Britain where thugs and psychopaths could murder and maim and torture and never have a finger laid on them for it; they did not fight for a Britain whose leaders would be too cowardly to declare war on terrorism; they did not fight for a Britain whose Parliament would, time and again, betray its trust by legislating against the wishes of the country; they did not fight for a Britain where children could be snatched from their homes and parents by night on nothing more than the good old Inquisition principle of secret information; they did not fight for a Britain whose Churches and schools would be undermined by fashionable reformers; they did not fight for a Britain where free choice could be anathematised as “discriminisation”; they did not fight for a Britain where to hold by truths and values which have been thought good and worthy for a thousand years would be to run the risk of being called “fascist” – that, really, is the greatest and most pitiful irony of all.
No, it is not what they fought for – but being realists they accept what they cannot alter, and reserve their protests for the noise pollution of modern music in their pubs. Quartered Safe Out Here: A Harrowing Tale of World War II Paperback – August 5, 2014

Somewhere Labor got taken over by the Limousine Liberals. Possibly you might be saying, these are the ramblings of an old white man who is racist. What if a black man was saying the same thing?

The Limousine Liberal destroyed the black man

The Limousine Liberal’s story didn’t add up, I discovered that from 1900 to the 1960s, despite segregation, Jim Crow Laws, and racism, the wage gap between blacks and whites was naturally closing. From 1900 till the 1960s, the percentage of black university graduates was increasing. Take into account, this was during segregation, these were universities that were built by blacks. Meanwhile, the percentage of black home owners was also increasing. Europeans who visited Black Harlem during the 1930s described it as a black renaissance. After WW2, due to the bravery of black soldiers, blacks had proven they could stand on their own two feet. Mysterious around the 1980s, things started to reverse, by the 1990s, the black man ceased to exist. The Limousine Liberal’s explanation of racism doesn’t add up. I asked myself, what happened?

Later I stumbled up the account of an elderly black lady described being moved into a public housing similar to Jews being forced into the Ghettos in Poland. Most of the blacks didn’t want to relocate but they were told that their houses were condemned, they needed to relocate. When they relocated the blacks into public housing, they didn’t send the same communities into public housing, instead, they separated them. Before the black communities were held together by the church and family, these two key organizations where destroyed. The elderly black lady, unfortunately, couldn’t see the big picture. The question is how did they manage to achieve this?

How Limousine Liberal destroyed the black man

Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Mathew 7:15, King James Bible

When the Limousine Liberal initially attacks, they follow a general pattern. First they claim you are ignorant and you are not qualified to have an opinion. They will then claim you do not have proper sources to back up your points, if you do, they claim you do not understand them. If that fails, they write off the points with shoddy science. The allure for the traditional black man and intellectuals is the Limousine Liberal claims to value education and science. Finally the Limousine Liberal, claims to want equality and fair play. How do you identify a Limousine Liberal from a person who might be naive?

For every tree is known by his own fruit. For of thorns men do not gather figs, nor of a bramble bush gather they grapes. Luke 6:44, King James Bible

You judge a man by what he has produced. The Limousine Liberal will deflect from this.

Burgess Owens is a black man who grew up in Ohio when it still had Jim Crow laws. He doesn’t cut any bones about the racism he faced but as he points out, it is racism to blame white people for something their ancestors did. His book Liberalism or How to Turn Good Men into Whiners, Weenies and Wimps is self-explanatory. During slavery, it was illegal to teach blacks to read or write. Despite this, blacks figured out ways to learn how to read and write. Later black men like Booker T. Washington literally built a university from nothing. Dr. Washington had his potential students construct a kiln to make bricks to build a university. The black man proved himself from the Buffalo soldiers to Tuskegee Airmen proved himself equal to the white man. How come the Limousine Liberal forgets this history and paints the black man as an inferior who needs special privileges?

“For those who grew up in the Deep South, in the days of the KKK and Jim Crow segregation, pride in community was not founded on the embellishment of opportunities lost due to racism. Instead it was built on the highlighting of the great accomplishments achieved, in spite of the obstacles. The “can do” outlook that prevailed in past generations cleared the pathway to prosperity and celebrated a creative, courageous, and self-respecting community determined not to be held back. They succeeded in their quest.” - Burgess Owens Liberalism or How to Turn Good Men into Whiners, Weenies and Wimps

He is asking the black community to question its modern values.

If we as a community are to resurrect ourselves, we must demand honest answers. How do we rate as proud American citizens after 60 years of loyalty to the ideology of Liberalism? Can we look to our men today, as did past generations and apply to them the titles Defenders, Champions, and Patriots? Would they accept them? If our country was in need and called on us, as it has over the last 200 years, would our community feel a connection, a bond of loyalty and gratitude? Would we feel honored to accept? Liberalism or How to Turn Good Men into Whiners, Weenies and Wimps

Within his book, Liberalism or How to Turn Good Men into Whiners, Weenies and Wimps goes into great detail the ideas of an original black leader were subverted by socials. The tactic of the socialist the wolf in sheep’s clothing. Any black leader that stepped out of line would be attacked. In the case of Booker T. Washington, he was attacked for teaching blacks traded which where could be linked to black slavery. Using early Limousine Liberal logic, making bricks or learning a trade like carpentry is equivalent to black slavery. When it suits their agenda, Limousine Liberals have no qualms about using racism. If that fails, they will resort to other tactics.

Mr. Burgess Owens did not use Bill Crosby as an example of this, but I was always extremely suspicious of the circumstances of his allegedly sexual misconduct. The allegations did not appear until Bill Crosby gave a speech saying blacks should start accepting responsibility, stop listening to hip hop music, stop running around in their underpants. After this, Bill Crosby was attacked by Black Limousine Liberals. The allegations against Bill Crosby portrayed him as a black opportunist with racial overtones. Meanwhile, when OJ Simpson murders his wife, despite overwhelming evidence, anyone who accuses him of murder is racist.

White nationalists, who say, what do I care about blacks? Well read Liberalism or How to Turn Good Men into Whiners, Weenies and Wimps, the exact same thing is happening to you. It is a warning for others and a call for action for the black community.

To defeat the enemy, you must adapt to his tactics

Two major events happened this year. The first was the election of President Duterte in the Philippines. Despite being attacked by mainstream media, western media and foreign governments like Australia criticizing President Duterte he managed to win. Social media and grass roots efforts got him elected. President Duterte is constantly being attacked by western Limousine Liberals. Limousine Liberals are always good at attacking but they never provide a solution. This was to be repeated in the US election with President Trump. Again the Limousine Liberal tactics failed.

Right now a breach has been opened, the Limousine Liberals are in disarray. If you think that President Trump, President Duterte can fix things magically, you are naive. These leaders must be kept accountable. The mainstream no longer controls media, this is changing things even in places like Communist China as I showed in my post The ancient magical kingdom is a dangerous myth. Things are actually getting better - the bluepill wants you to think otherwise..

To defeat the enemy, you have to learn his tactics and improve on them.

Further directions

The purpose of this post is to show that originally Liberal used to mean supporting Labor. The true meaning of Liberal has changed and now they have rewritten history. There is a difference between liberal and conservative thinking, for this reason, socialists first decided to attack liberals. Now that they subverted liberals they are now turning their sights on conservatives. Limousine Liberals like to fight by proxy and using divide and conquer. I personally am an agnostic, Mr. Burgess is a Mormon but one should judge a person by their actions as opposed to their beliefs.

The purpose of my previous post Filipino paradox - extremely honest but extremely dishonest was to give people a view on how culture affects thinking. In later posts, I will show how different cultures as part of multiculturalism is used as a modern form of divide and conquer. In the case of black, the black slavery issue was repeatedly used.

It has been both purposeful and effective on the part of the ideology of Liberalism to inject within the Black community a sense of victimization and then to disconnect it from its proud past through revisionism. This strategy has had a tremendously negative impact on race relations as White Americans are tasked to take on the responsibility for the actions of other White strangers, who died hundreds of years ago. In the meanwhile, this high bar of accountability is imposed on them by a class of Black Americans who refuse to take responsibility for their own actions within the last 24 hours. Because of the decades-long embrace of this ideology, many Black Americans are no longer able to envision for themselves the promise of America. They have accepted the premise that doors once closed to their ancestors remain closed today. They remain unaware of the multi-generational success stories of their own ancestry earned through tenacity, ingenuity, hard work and vision. Many Black Americans who choose to work, study and achieve are today faced with the temptation to accept a false narrative that their accomplishments are beyond the reach of others of their race. Many are made to believe that their adoption of successful habits regarding personal appearance, speech, attitude, morality and actions are “white people” actions and they have become Uncle Tom-ish. They thus proceed to categorize their success as luck, which is not only a condescending insult to their own race, but also an insult to a nation that grants like opportunities to every other race and culture. Liberalism or How to Turn Good Men into Whiners, Weenies and Wimps

Mr Burges also gives many examples of black leaders in the 1900s criticizing blacks who became professional victims. This type of thinking has now been spread by Limousine Liberals to other ethnic and cultural groups. Once the tactics of the Limousine Liberal are known, one can learn how to protect themselves from them and learn to fight back.

I am tired from my keyboard mashing as one of my critics calls it. Send me bitcoin so I can buy a bottle of whiskey 3NgksauCyuLcVRqLHVLbAnhP2UqmqspJVQ. If your are in the Philipines and need a bitcoin account you can sign up for one at

You can also follow me on twitter at @sir_wankalote, I also have an account on gab @sir_wankalot_here the free speech alternative. If there is a post or topic you would like me to write about, feel free to contact me via twitter or Reddit.